#The legend of tarzan movie#
#The legend of tarzan tv#

But within minutes, he is up and running and swinging through the jungle as if he had left for a weekend instead of many years. After Tarzan, Jane and their party arrive in Congo, they are attacked by RomвЂ™s men, who kidnap Jane and leave Tarzan momentarily out of commission. The Legend of Tarzan, however, only plays fleeting lip service to that. There is a potentially fascinating story to tell here of a man who struggles to repress his true nature to fit into вЂњproperвЂќ society, and how he must reclaim his real self in order to survive. Where the film (and the screenplay by Adam Cozad and Craig Brewer) fails even more egregiously is in its development of Tarzan himself. But both actors rely more on their usual tricks instead of breathing any real life into the characters, with the mannered Waltz in particular needing a long vacation from bad guys.

Jackson), the African-American writer whose actual journey to Congo вЂ“ where he exposed LeopoldвЂ™s horrific mistreatment of the population there вЂ“ is woven into this story. ThereвЂ™s also some novelty in incorporating real historical figures into the story, such as Rom himself (who was by all accounts a nasty piece of work) and George Washington Williams (portrayed with his patented combination of snark and indifference by Samuel L. The idea of Tarzan being a media personality of his age (as far as it goes) is an interesting one, and thereвЂ™s even a moment where Waltz riffs on the вЂњme Tarzan, you JaneвЂќ clichГ©. Director David Yates (the Harry Potter franchise) makes it all look murky and unappetizing to boot, and for a tentpole-sized film, Tarzan is saddled with some obvious fake sets and a lot of genuinely shoddy CG. Sadly, Skarsgard doesnвЂ™t have the charisma to pull off the character and is saddled by a script that makes him into a one-dimensional superhero instead of exploring his potentially intriguing dual nature.

But The Legend of Tarzan, starring Alexander Skarsgard as the titular hero and Margot Robbie as his American love Jane Porter, is a generic, tedious adventure that hopes you will have some sort of vague memory of the character while also attempting a half-hearted post-modern spin on his mythology. In a way, that could make Tarzan ripe for reinvention in an expensive new feature film.

#The legend of tarzan movie#

The last live-action Tarzan movie was released in 1998 (Disney produced an animated one the following year), and like a lot of his contemporaries вЂ“ the Lone Ranger, Green Hornet and BurroughsвЂ™ John Carter among them вЂ“ TarzanвЂ™s name doesnвЂ™t conjure up a certain kind of classical pulp adventure but rather a hazy memory of something your grandparents once watched in black and white.

#The legend of tarzan tv#

He is also one of the most famous fictional characters of the 20 th century, the subject of some 26 books written by his creator, Edgar Rice Burroughs, not to mention the star of many other books, comics, movies, radio shows and TV series.Д«ut this is the 21 st century, and what might have been instantly recognizable a few decades ago is now either a curio or completely forgotten by newer generations of fans and consumers finding their own heroes. Who is Tarzan? He is John Clayton, the Viscount Greystoke, who is left alone in the African jungles as a child and raised into a feral yet heroic man вЂ“ the вЂњlord of the jungleвЂќ - by a tribe of great apes.